Rightwing Think Tank's Ridiculous "Confidential" Memo; This is a MUST READ document

Excellent find!!! Hey, everybody, the attached document is loaded and suggest you all read and study it throughly. Wow, somebody sure did screw up by e-mailing it to the wrong third party. The strategy is literally the who's who and who's gonna do what. MUST READ!!!

we can now see how money is used to manipulate the masses of voters who don't think or reason. Just give them rabid nonsense to repeat.

Wow! What we always suspected was going on.... now there is something to back it up with.

I found it interesting that though the AGU has completely debunked Anthony Watt's weather station project, he is still collecting donations for it, and apparently large ones. The document says

Anthony Watts proposes to create a new Web site devoted to accessing the new temperature data

from NOAA’s web site and converting them into easy-to-understand graphs that can be easily

found and understood by weathermen and the general interested public. Watts has deep expertise

in Web site design generally and is well-known and highly regarded by weathermen and

-20-

meteorologists everywhere. The new site will be promoted heavily at WattsUpwithThat.com.

Heartland has agreed to help Anthony raise $88,000 for the project in 2011. The Anonymous

Donor has already pledged $44,000. We’ll seek to raise the balance.

far wrong-wing think-tank are tied for with military intelligence for worst, or best oxymoron of the century !!!

luv,

ron

This has about as much credibility as a Bible and as under a theocratic rule there is a demand that it be accepted as a truth. So much for skepticism.

Perhaps, we can deal with specifics. First of all if you have read any of my Postings you would have quickly reached the conclusion that I do not represent a Creationist point of view, therefore you would know and not have to say "i dunno". I believe that translates to English, as I do not know. 

Congratulations, by the way, on this Site and inviting me, I believe it was you, to participate. I enjoy a confrontational dialogue, as it spurs the mind.  To be clear, as to my particular point of view, I am Atheistic, capital "A", but prefer the designation of a Sapient Being or Sapien. I do not believe one can be more, be greater than a reasoning being; therefore such identification goes a long way to dispel the petty differences that separate us. I also hold that the Bill of Rights is the greatest document the world has ever seen. It is not a perfect document, but close. 

I do not accept the Globalist view of  a Man induced global warming that threatens the planet, but I am certainly interested in any 'real' and specific evidence that you may like to bring to the table. this, of course, would rule out shot gun accusations and socialistic commentary. 

As to a position, I'm a proponent of science. I was not aware that one must declare a position before posting a comment.

Your Petition Project has the same problem as with many endorsements. It is not always clear how well qualified those who endorse the position are, or whether the numbers listed are significant. There are about 23 million graduates with degrees in science and engineering. If 31,000 scientists signed the Oregon Petition, that is about 0.13% of those – hardly significant. Even then, the petition appears to be a hoax. In 1989, the Petition was mailed to thousands of Bachelor of Science students. It was formatted to appear as if it came from the National Academy of Science, but the organization quickly responded that the information was misleading and “the petition does not reflect the conclusions of expert reports of the Academy.” The mailing collected 17,000 signatures and 14,000 have been added since. Most anyone could sign it, many who signed were misled, and many were not scientists at all, as it is possible to get BS degrees in fields such as journalism, sociology, education, philosophy…

If you are swayed by endorsements, all the major scientific organizations in the world have endorsed a statement such as that of the American Chemical Society, ”Careful and comprehensive scientific assessments have clearly demonstrated that the Earth’s climate system is changing rapidly in response to growing atmospheric burdens of greenhouse gases and absorbing aerosol particles. There is very little room for doubt that observed climate trends are due to human activities. The threats are serious and action is urgently needed to mitigate the risks of climate change.” A recent CNN poll found that 97% of scientists who are actively engaged in research in climate science agree.